Archive for December, 2016

America Is An Ochlocracy Not A Democracy! Witnessing 2016 Election Of Russia Hacking, WikiLeaks Leaking, White House Doing Nothing, Intel Agencies Playing Blind, Republicans Stealing, Corrupt Media Lying For A Con Man And Embezzler, This Is Hypocrisy!

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 17, 2016 by sheriffali

Former Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton Didn’t Lose; The Presidency Was Stolen From Secretary Clinton By America’s Ochlocracy.


America’s Democracy Is Hypocrisy

Election 2016


America Is Not A Democracy

But It Is An Ochlocracy,

The 2016 General Election

Is An Unequivocal Indictment


An Administration Sat On The Sideline

Intel Agencies Pretending They’re Blind,

As Russia Enhanced Their Hacking

And WikiLeaks Did Putin’s Bidding


US Supreme Court Voided Sec 4 Voting Rights Act

Opening A Fraudulent Republican Track,

The GOP Dishonestly Suppressed The Minority

And Willfully Discarded Mail In Tally


On Election Day November Eight

Con Man Trump Elected To The White House Gate,

As America’s Corrupt Corporate Media

Slaughtered The Qualified Challenger!



History Will Record America’s 2016 Election That Exposed United States Hypocrisy Of Democracy Where Phantasmagoric Rationales And Internecine Narcissistic Deluge Became Facts.

©Sheriff Gerry Ali December 17, 2016


Twitter @sheriffali


Hillary Clinton Takes On The Fight Directly For The Presidency Demanding The CIA Declassify The Russian Election Involvement And In Addition, Demanding That The Obama Administration Come Clean With What And When They Knew About Putin’s Involvement.

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , , , on December 13, 2016 by sheriffali


In fairness to Secretary Hillary Clinton, both she and her campaign had forewarned everyone of Russia’s involvement to sway the Election to Donald Trump and Hillary’s disappointment with FBI Director James Comey’s Pernicious Letter, 11 days before the Election.


Hillary Clinton is going for the Political Kill and Donald Trump is a “Free-Fall Panic.” Trump just filed “Bogus Legal Action in an Attempt to Stop the Electoral College from Denying Him the Fraudulent Presidency.” Trump is on shady grounds because even Republicans are now on board investigating Vladimir Putin and Russia’s involvement in America’s Election.

[New York Times] “Clinton campaign demands declassification of election intelligence.


As the swirl of allegations around Russia’s efforts to elect Mr. Trump roils Washington, one voice has been absent: Hillary Clinton’s.


John D. Podesta, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, broke the silence on her behalf, demanding the declassification of all information about Russia’s meddling as well as an explanation from the Obama administration of what it knew and when it knew it.


“We now know that the C.I.A. has determined Russia’s interference in our elections was for the purpose of electing Donald Trump,” Mr. Podesta wrote in a statement. “This should distress every American. Never before in the history of our republic have we seen such an effort to undermine the bedrock of our democracy.”


“This is not a partisan issue, and we are glad to see bipartisan support in the Congress for an investigation into Russia’s role,” he continued. “We believe that the administration owes it to the American people to explain what it knows regarding the extent and manner of Russia’s interference and this be done as soon as possible. To that end, we also support the request from members of the Senate Intelligence Committee to declassify information around Russia’s roles in the election and to make this data available to the public.”


Thrown on the defensive, Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, said on Monday that the White House did not announce a major probe of Russia’s interference before the election partly because many voters would have seen such an announcement as political meddling.


He said Russia did not hack the electoral process or the counting of votes.


“But what is also clear is that the results of the hack and leak effort carried out on the orders of Russia were extensively discussed prior to the election,” Mr. Earnest said.


Trump continues Russia denial — via Twitter.


With evidence mounting that Russian intelligence promoted his election, the president-elect continued his denial, via Twitter.”


Twitter @sheriffali




[LEGAL-FACT] The Electoral College Was Meant to Stop Men Like Trump From Being President The founders envisioned electors as people who could prevent an irresponsible demagogue from taking office.

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 11, 2016 by sheriffali


[The Atlantic] “The Constitution says nothing about the people as a whole electing the president. It says in Article II that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.” Those electors then vote for president and vice-president. They can be selected “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” This is to say, any way the state legislature wants. In 14 states in the early 19th century, state legislatures chose their electors directly. The people did not vote at all.  


Americans talk about democracy like it’s sacred. In public discourse, the more democratic American government is the better. The people are supposed to rule.


But that’s not the premise that underlies America’s political system. Most of the men who founded the United States feared unfettered majority rule. James Madison wrote in Federalist 10 that systems of government based upon “pure democracy … has ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property.” John Adams wrote in 1814 that, “Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself.”


The framers constructed a system that had democratic features. The people had a voice. They could, for instance, directly elect members of the House of Representatives. But the founders also self-consciously limited the people’s voice.


The Bill of Rights is undemocratic. It limits the federal government’s power in profound ways, ways the people often dislike. Yet the people can do almost nothing about it. The Supreme Court is undemocratic, too. Yes, the people elect the president (kind of, more on that later), who appoints justices of the Supreme Court, subject to approval by the Senate, which these days is directly elected, too. But after that, the justices wield their extraordinary power for as long as they wish without any democratic accountability. The vast majority of Americans may desperately want their government to do something. The Supreme Court can say no. The people then lose, unless they pass a constitutional amendment, which is extraordinarily difficult, or those Supreme Court justices die.


That’s the way the framers wanted it. And, oddly, it’s the way most contemporary Americans want it too. Americans say they revere democracy. Yet they also revere those rights—freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms—that the government’s least democratic institutions protect. Americans rarely contemplate these contradictions. If they did, they might be more open to preventing Donald Trump from becoming the next president, the kind of democratic catastrophe that the Constitution and the Electoral College in particular, were in part designed to prevent.



Donald Trump was not elected on November 8. Under the Constitution, the real election will occur on December 19. That’s when the electors in each state cast their votes.”


Twitter @sheriffali




Open The Atlantic Link For Full Article:






Republican Electoral Elector – “Why I Will Not Cast My Electoral Vote for Donald Trump! The Electoral College Is Supposed To Determine If A Candidate Is Qualified To Be President. Trump Has Not Met Its Standards.”

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 6, 2016 by sheriffali


Fifteen years ago, I swore an oath to defend my country and Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. On Dec. 19, I will do it again.



DALLAS — I am a Republican presidential elector, one of the 538 people asked to choose officially the president of the United States. Since the election, people have asked me to change my vote based on policy disagreements with Donald J. Trump. In some cases, they cite the popular vote difference. I do not think president-elects should be disqualified for policy disagreements. I do not think they should be disqualified because they won the Electoral College instead of the popular vote. However, now I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office.


Fifteen years ago, as a firefighter, I was part of the response to the Sept. 11 attacks against our nation. That attack and this year’s election may seem unrelated, but for me the relationship becomes clearer every day.


George W. Bush is an imperfect man, but he led us through the tragic days following the attacks. His leadership showed that America was a great nation. That was also the last time I remember the nation united. I watch Mr. Trump fail to unite America and drive a wedge between us.


Mr. Trump goes out of his way to attack the cast of “Saturday Night Live” for bias. He tweets day and night, but waited two days to offer sympathy to the Ohio State community after an attack there. He does not encourage civil discourse, but chooses to stoke fear and create outrage.


This is unacceptable. For me, America is that shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan envisioned. It has problems. It has challenges. These can be met and overcome just as our nation overcame Sept. 11.


The United States was set up as a republic. Alexander Hamilton provided a blueprint for states’ votes. Federalist 68 argued that an Electoral College should determine if candidates are qualified, not engaged in demagogy, and independent from foreign influence! Mr. Trump shows us again and again that he does not meet these standards. Given his own public statements, it isn’t clear how the Electoral College can ignore these issues, and so it should reject him.



Twitter @sheriffali




Open NYT Link For Full Article:



Breaking Report: Trump Campaign Allegedly Violated Constitutional Law to Alter Election Results. Penalties Include Prison Time if Charged. 20 GOP Secretaries Of State Collaborated With Trump Campaign

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , on December 5, 2016 by sheriffali


Evidence supports the argument that the 2016 election was manipulated. More than 20 GOP Secretaries of State collaborated with key members of the Trump Campaign may have collaborated to deprive millions of minorities of the right to vote. Penalties may include 10 years in prison if charged.


If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or


If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—


They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both…– 18 USC 241


In efforts to secure the White House for Donald Trump, major members of his campaign – including Trump himself – engaged in a coordinated voter suppression campaign the likes of which haven’t been seen since the Civil War.


In doing so these individuals and organizations – which include, Sheldon Adelson, Charles Koch, David Koch, Gregg Phillips, Kris Kobach, SOS for SoS (now disbanded), the Scaife Family foundations, the Immigration Law Reform Institute, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the government officials connected to the Interstate Crosscheck system and Donald Trump – may have triggered numerous violations of Constitutional law that were designed to prevent just such election manipulations and deprivation of rights.


Twitter @sheriffali


Campaign Shifts Pennsylvania Recount Effort From State To Federal Court

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , , , on December 5, 2016 by sheriffali


Lawyers for the presidential campaign of Green Party candidate Jill Stein have changed tactics in their legal effort to force a recount of the vote in Pennsylvania, shifting their case from the state to federal level. The campaign will now seek an emergency federal-court order on Monday asking for a recount on constitutional grounds, according to the Associated Press, after having dropping their case in the state courts on Saturday. It appears the change is due to Pennsylvania setting a $1 million bond, due Monday, to proceed with the recount. Stein rejected that requirement in a statement released late Saturday:


The judge’s outrageous demand that voters pay such an exorbitant figure is a shameful, unacceptable barrier to democratic participation. This is yet another sign that Pennsylvania’s antiquated election law is stacked against voters. By demanding a $1 million bond from voters yesterday, the court made clear it has no interest in giving a fair hearing to these voters’ legitimate concerns over the accuracy, security and fairness of an election tainted by suspicion.


As Politico points out, the previous recount-cost estimate by state officials was $500,000. Stein has raised about $6.8 million for her three-state recount campaign, but that’s a few million dollars short of what the Stein camp has said it will need to pay for the effort. In other words, it’s not clear if the Stein campaign could have afforded the $1 million bond in Pennsylvania should they have been willing to pay it.


As justification for the move to federal court, Stein campaign lawyer Jonathan Abady insisted that “it has become clear that the barriers to verifying the vote in Pennsylvania are so pervasive and that the state court system is so ill-equipped to address this problem that we must seek federal court intervention.”


Twitter @sheriffali





Standing Rock Tribe Victorious As US Army Denies Easement And Blocks Route Of North Dakota Pipeline!

Posted in United States with tags , , , , , , , , on December 5, 2016 by sheriffali


In a decision celebrated by the thousands of protestors gathered at the Standing Rock site, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced Sunday that they would not grant an easement for the Dakota Access Pipeline and would instead “explore alternate routes.”


“Although we have had continuing discussion and exchanges of new information with the Standing Rock Sioux and Dakota Access, it’s clear that there’s more work to do,” Jo-Ellen Darcy, the Army’s assistant secretary for civil works Darcy said Sunday. “The best way to complete that work responsibly and expeditiously is to explore alternate routes for the pipeline crossing.”


The announcement was celebrated by those gathered at the protest sites, including 2,000 U.S. military veterans that joined the protests on December 2nd to protect them from the authorities; in recent weeks, altercations between protestors and law enforcement have escalated.


Prior to Sunday’s decision, federal officials had given protestors, who have reiterated that the pipeline would threaten the water supply and damage sacred sites, until Monday to leave the protest site.


U.S. Secretary for the Interior Sally Jewell added in a statement that Sunday’s decision “ensures that there will be an in-depth evaluation of alternative routes for the pipeline and a closer look at potential impacts” and “underscores that tribal rights reserved in treaties and federal law, as well as Nation-to-Nation consultation with tribal leaders, are essential components of the analysis to be undertaken in the environmental impact statement going forward,” the Washington Post reports.


Twitter @sheriffali