Archive for GOP Warmongers

Fox News Your Television For The Haters Liars Crooks Bigots Racists Welcomes The Republican 2016 Hopefuls On August 6, 2015 To Their First Debate. Too Many Clowns In The Political Run-Away-Clown-Train Some Had To Be Cut. What A Shame!

Posted in Politics, Presidency 2016, White House with tags , , , , , , , on August 2, 2015 by sheriffali

[Washington Post] The last few national polls are trickling in, finalizing which Republicans are in and which are out for this week’s first 2016 debate in Cleveland. It’s only the ten with the highest polling averages, remember, meaning that John Kasich’s well-timed announcement bump has displaced Rick Perry, whose attempt to pick a fight with Donald Trump very much did not work. With the new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, the stage likely looks like this.

 

The biggest change in this new graphic is that Jeb Bush is no longer in the top two, for the first time since we started compiling these graphics in late May. That is what political pundits call a “bad sign” — but one probably shouldn’t read too much into it, just yet.

 

We don’t know how many more polls are waiting in the wings this week; it seems safe to assume that pollsters will be looking to capitalize on the big splash that each new poll will bring. But it is very unlikely we’ll see many dramatic changes to the stage as it appears above. But then, in this election cycle, you never know.

 

Twitter @sheriffali

 

http://wpo.st/SnFT0

 GOP - AUGUST 6 FOX DEBATERS - 2 GOP - 2016 HOPEFULS EMBARASSING AMERICA - 2

CNN Tabloid News Is Bankrupt Of Shame As Most Of The Corporate Owned Media. Imagine! 29% Of Americans Blame President Obama For Hurricane Katrina Disaster While 28% Blame George W Bush. With That Amount Of Stupidity Flooding America, How Can Any Poll Decipher How Many People Trust Or Don’t Trust Hillary Clinton.

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on July 8, 2015 by sheriffali

Hillary Clinton has spent all of her adult life protecting Children, Women’s Rights, Minorities and to date, despite all of the phantasmagoric rationales and internecine accusations, Mrs. Clinton has never been charged for any crimes whatsoever.

George W Bush, Dick Cheney and the entire G W Bush Administration sat around with threats months in advance that Al Qaeda was determined to strike within the Continental United States Using Aircrafts as Lethal Weapons and on August 6, 2001 the Presidential Daily Briefing [PDF] specifically headed that day’s report, Bush and his administration sat around until 3,000 Americans including other Nationalities were killed in the 9/11 horrible terrorist attack. To date, no Republican has ever really asked any serious question about that negligence, but to this day, Republicans are still carrying on about Benghazi.

Under President Ronald Reagan we had 13 attacks that killed 93 people; and if you count the Marines Reagan sent to Lebanon where 243 Marines were killed in one day from a suicide attack, the shock is still there. Under George W Bush we had 7 attacks that killed 51 people and under President Obama and Hillary Clinton we had one attack, Benghazi, that killed 4 people, and three years later at a cost of 57 million dollars to the taxpayers; 13 Investigations, Republicans are still beating the conspiracy drum on Benghazi.

Just how long the Right Wing, uninformed, ignorant, uneducated, brainwashed GOP voters would take to see that their Republican Leaders for who they are; CROOKS, LIARS, THIEVES, WAR MONGERS, THAT ONLY CARES ABOUT THE 1%.

[VOX] Hillary 101

Hillary Clinton is iconic to both her fans and her detractors. At the end of 2014, for the 13th consecutive year, she was named the woman that Americans most admire in the world. And yet politicians, authors and talk show hosts, including some liberals, have made careers out of demonizing her.

 

Now, for the second time, she is seeking the presidency, and one of the highly polarized views of her will win out in 2016.

 

To understand why one person simultaneously inspires so much enthusiasm and so much enmity from the American public — and to understand what has propelled her from mountain to valley and back again — you have to carefully examine the mix of ambition, determination, policy acumen, and political maneuvering that drove a conservative Midwestern girl to become the Democratic Party’s best hope for winning the presidency in 2016.

 

And you have to understand that her political life has been lived in an era of increasing polarization, decreasing trust in public figures and institutions, and perpetual electoral politics.

 

Clinton’s long tenure in the eye of the national political storm — a quarter of a century by Election Day 2016 — makes her unique among this cycle’s crop of presidential aspirants. By contrast, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz are new on the landscape. Democratic rival Bernie Sanders was elected to Congress two years before Clinton came to Washington, but his profile has been much lower. Even Jeb Bush, whose father and brother were president, has never before been a national political player in the way Clinton has been as first lady, New York senator, secretary of state, and two-time presidential candidate.

 

All that time in the spotlight has brought concomitant scrutiny, and the file on Clinton is thick. Its pages are filled with gritty battles, triumphant victories, bruising defeats and humiliations, scandals and pseudo-scandals, political resurrections, policy evolutions, and too many contradictions to count.

 

It’s almost too much for anyone to process at once. After all, Clinton herself already has written two full-length memoirs. One instructive way of trying to grasp who Clinton is today, and where she came from, is to look at the defining moments of her public life, from overachieving student to political spouse to high-ranking government official.

 

Twitter @sheriffali

 

http://www.vox.com/2015/7/7/8909217/hillary-clinton-cnn-interview

CNN - HILLARY CLINTON JULY 7 2015 - 3 HILLARY CLINTON WHITE HOUSE - 6 

 

 

A Promising Nuclear Deal With Iran And The Face You Make When Sabotage Fails

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 3, 2015 by sheriffali

[NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL] The preliminary agreement between Iran and the major powers is a significant achievement that makes it more likely Iran will never be a nuclear threat. President Obama said it would “cut off every pathway that Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon.”

 

Officials said some important issues have not been resolved, like the possible lifting of a United Nations arms embargo, and writing the technical sections could also cause problems before the deal’s finalization, expected by June 30. Even so, the agreement announced on Thursday after eight days of negotiations appears more specific and comprehensive than expected.

 

It would roll back Iran’s nuclear program sufficiently so that Iran could not quickly produce a nuclear weapon, and ensure that, if Iran cheated, the world would have at least one year to take preventive action, including reimposing sanctions. In return, the United States, the European Union and the United Nations would lift sanctions crippling Iran’s economy, though the timing of such a move is yet another uncertainty.

 

Iran would shut down roughly two-thirds of the 19,000 centrifuges producing uranium that could be used to fuel a bomb and agree not to enrich uranium over 3.67 percent (a much lower level than is required for a bomb) for at least 15 years. The core of the reactor at Arak, which officials feared could produce plutonium, another key ingredient for making a weapon, would be dismantled and replaced, with the spent fuel shipped out of Iran.

 

Mr. Obama, speaking at the White House, insisted he was not relying on trust to ensure Iran’s compliance but on “the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever negotiated for any nuclear program.”

 

There is good reason for skepticism about Iran’s intentions. Although it pledged not to acquire nuclear weapons when it ratified the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 1970, it pursued a secret uranium enrichment program for two decades. By November 2013, when serious negotiations with the major powers began, Iran was enriching uranium at a level close to bomb-grade.

 

However, Iran has honored an interim agreement with the major powers, in place since January 2014, by curbing enrichment and other major activities.

 

By opening a dialogue between Iran and America, the negotiations have begun to ease more than 30 years of enmity. Over the long run, an agreement could make the Middle East safer and offer a path for Iran, the leading Shiite country, to rejoin the international community.

 

The deal, if signed and carried out, would vindicate the political risks taken by President Hassan Rouhani of Iran and President Obama to engage after decades of estrangement starting from the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

 

Talking to adversaries — as President Ronald Reagan did in nuclear weapons negotiations with the Soviets and President Richard Nixon did in his opening to China — is something American leaders have long pursued as a matter of practical necessity and prudence.

 

Yet in today’s poisonous political climate, Mr. Obama’s critics have gone to extraordinary lengths to undercut him and any deal. Their belligerent behavior is completely out of step with the American public, which overwhelmingly favors a negotiated solution with Iran, unquestionably the best approach.

 

Sunni Arab nations and Israel are deeply opposed to any deal, fearing that it would strengthen Iran’s power in the region. This agreement addresses the nuclear program, the most urgent threat, and does not begin to tackle Iran’s disruptive role in Syria and elsewhere. Iran is widely seen as a threat; whether it can get beyond that will depend on whether its leaders choose to be less hostile to its neighbors, including Israel.

 

Twitter @sheriffali

 

http://nyti.ms/1GlyUcb

 GOP SABOTAGE BACKFIRED